动态密度聚类算法的研究与挑战
需积分: 9 46 浏览量
更新于2024-07-17
收藏 480KB PDF 举报
"这篇PDF文件探讨了动态密度聚类方法，主要关注DBSCAN（Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise）这一密度基础聚类算法及其在动态数据环境中的应用。DBSCAN能够有效地找出基于密度连接的对象聚集，而无需预先设定簇的数量。然而，在数据不断更新的情况下，如何高效地维护这些聚类成为一个挑战。"
DBSCAN是一种流行的数据挖掘技术，它通过考虑对象之间的邻近性和密度来识别数据集中的核心对象、边界对象和噪声。在DBSCAN中，一个对象属于一个簇如果它周围有一定密度的邻居，这个密度通常通过最小邻域半径(eps)和最小邻域对象数(minPts)来定义。这种方法特别适用于发现不规则形状的聚类，并且对异常值容忍度较高。
在动态环境中，如当数据集允许插入和删除操作时，传统的DBSCAN算法需要重新计算整个数据集的邻接关系，这可能导致显著的计算开销。因此，文献中提出了ρ-approximate DBSCAN，其目标是降低静态数据上的计算复杂性。然而，该文件指出，即使在完全动态的数据集上，即同时处理插入和删除，ρ-approximate DBSCAN也面临着与原始DBSCAN相同的困难，即计算难度仍然很高。
作者Junhao Gan和Yufei Tao进一步研究了这个问题，并揭示了ρ-approximate版本在处理动态数据时的局限性。他们可能还讨论了可能的优化策略或新的动态聚类算法，以应对这种挑战。这些策略可能包括增量式更新、局部调整或者利用数据结构的特性来减少不必要的计算。
在实际应用中，动态聚类对于实时分析、大数据流处理和物联网(IoT)等场景至关重要。例如，在监控系统中，新的传感器数据不断加入，旧的可能会丢失，需要实时调整聚类结果。因此，开发高效且适应性强的动态密度聚类算法是当前研究的重要方向。
这篇论文深入探讨了DBSCAN在动态环境下的挑战，并揭示了ρ-approximate DBSCAN在处理数据更新时的局限性。它为理解和改进动态聚类算法提供了重要的理论基础，对于希望优化大规模动态数据聚类的开发者和研究人员具有很高的参考价值。
o
6
o
7
o
8
o
9
o
10
o
11
o
12
o
13
o
14
o
15
o
16
o
17
o
18
ǫ
o
1
o
2
o
3
o
4
o
5
(1 + ρ)ǫ
o
6
o
7
o
8
o
9
o
10
o
11
o
12
o
14
o
15
o
16
o
17
o
1
o
2
o
3
o
4
o
5
o
6
o
7
o
8
o
9
o
10
o
11
o
12
o
14
o
15
o
16
o
17
o
1
o
2
o
3
o
4
o
5
(a) Dataset (b) Core graph (c) One possible ρ-approximate core graph
Figure 2: Illustration of DBSCAN and ρ-approximate DBSCAN (ρ = 0.5, MinPts = 3)
MinPts
, which can be regarded as a constant. Next, we review how
the clusters are formed using graph terminology.
Given a point
p ∈ P
, we use
B(p, r)
to represent the ball that is
centered at
p
, and has radius
r
. The point is said to be a core point
if
B(p, ǫ)
covers at least
MinPts
points of
P
(including
p
itself);
otherwise, it is a non-core point. To illustrate, consider the dataset
of 18 points in Figure 2a, where
ǫ
is the radius of the inner solid
circle, and
MinPts = 3
. The core points have been colored black,
while the non-core points colored white. The dashed circle can be
ignored for the time being.
DBSCAN clusters are defined in two steps. The first one focuses
exclusively on the core points, and groups them into preliminary
clusters. The second step determines how the non-core points should
be assigned to the clusters. Next, we explain the two steps in detail.
Step 1: Clustering Core Points.
It will be convenient to imagine an
undirected core graph
G
on
P
—this graph is conceptual and need
not be materialized. Specifically, each vertex of
G
corresponds
to a distinct core point in
P
. There is an edge between two core
points (a.k.a. vertices)
p
1
, p
2
if and only if
dist(p
1
, p
2
) ≤ ǫ
, where
dist(·, ·)
represents the Euclidean distance between two points. Fig-
ure 2b shows the core graph for the dataset of Figure 2a.
Each connected component (CC) of
G
constitutes a preliminary
cluster. In Figure 2b, there are 3 CCs (a.k.a. preliminary clusters).
Note that every core point belongs to exactly one preliminary cluster.
Step 2: Non-Core Assignment.
This step augments the preliminary
clusters with non-core points. For each non-core point
p
, DBSCAN
looks at every core point
p
core
∈ B(p, ǫ)
, and assigns
p
to the (only)
preliminary cluster containing
p
core
. Note that, in this manner,
p
may be assigned to zero, one, or more than one preliminary cluster.
After all the non-core points have been assigned, the preliminary
clusters become final clusters.
It should be clear from the above that the DBSCAN clusters are
uniquely defined by the parameters
ǫ
and
MinPts
, but they are
not necessarily disjoint. A non-core point may belong to multiple
clusters, while a core point must exist only in a single cluster. It is
possible that a non-core point is not in any cluster; such a point is
called noise.
In Figure 2a, there are two non-core points
o
13
and
o
18
. Since
B(o
13
, ǫ)
covers
o
14
,
o
13
is assigned to the preliminary cluster of
o
14
.
B(o
18
, ǫ)
, however, covers no core points, indicating that
o
18
is
noise. The final DBSCAN clusters are {o
1
, o
2
, ..., o
5
}, {o
6
, o
7
, ...,
o
12
}, {o
13
, o
14
, ..., o
17
}.
Remark.
DBSCAN can also be defined under the notion of “density-
reachable”; see [9]. The above graph-based definition is equiv-
alent, perhaps more intuitive, and allows a simple extension to
ρ-approximate DBSCAN, as we will see later.
Hardness of DBSCAN and USEC.
It is easy to see that the DB-
SCAN clusters on a set
P
of
n
points can be computed in
O ( n
2
)
time, noticing that the core graph
G
has
O ( n
2
)
edges. However,
clever algorithms should produce the clusters without generating all
the edges, and thus, avoid the quadratic trap. Indeed, when
d = 2
,
the clusters can be computed in only O(n log n) time [11].
It would be highly desired to find an algorithm of
˜
O ( n )
time for
d ≥ 3
, but recently Gan and Tao [10] have essentially dispelled
the possibility. They proved an
O ( n )
-time reduction from the unit-
spherical emptiness checking (USEC) problem to DBSCAN. In
other words, any
T (n)
-time DBSCAN algorithm implies that USEC
problem can be solved with O(T (n)) time.
In USEC, we are given a set
S
red
of red points and a set
S
blue
of blue points in
R
d
. All the points have distinct coordinates on
every dimension. The objective is to determine whether there exist a
red point
p
red
and a blue point
p
blue
such that
dist(p
red
, p
blue
) ≤ 1
(the distance threshold 1 can be replaced with any positive value by
scaling). The problem has a lower bound of
Ω(n
4/3
)
for
d ≥ 5
in a
broad class of algorithms [6,7]. For
d = 3
and
4
, beating the bound
has been a grand open problem in theoretical computer science, and
is widely believed [6] to be impossible. By the reduction of [10],
no DBSCAN algorithm can have running time
o(n
4/3
)
in
d ≥ 5
;
in
d = 3
and 4, this is also true unless unlikely ground-breaking
improvements could be made on 3D USEC.
Approximation and the Sandwich Guarantee.
Gan and Tao [10]
developed
ρ
-approximate DBSCAN, which returns almost the same
clusters as exact DBSCAN by offering a strong sandwich guarantee
that will be introduced shortly. In contrast to the high time complex-
ity of the latter, the approximate version takes only
O ( n )
expected
time to compute for any constant ρ > 0.
Besides the parameters
ǫ
and
MinPts
inherited from DBSCAN,
the approximate version accepts a third parameter
ρ
, which is a small
positive constant less than 1, and controls the clustering precision.
Its clusters can also be defined in the same two steps as in exact
DBSCAN, as explained below.
Step 1: Clustering Core Points.
It will also be convenient to follow
a graph-based approach. Let us define an undirected
ρ
-approximate
core graph
G
ρ
on the dataset
P
—again, this graph is conceptual
and need not be materialized. Each vertex of
G
ρ
corresponds to a
distinct core point in
P
. Given two core points
p
1
, p
2
, whether or
not G
ρ
has an edge between their vertices is determined as:
• The edge definitely exists if dist(p
1
, p
2
) ≤ ǫ.
剩余14页未读，继续阅读
2022-06-27 上传
2019-09-20 上传
2023-08-15 上传
2023-03-12 上传
2023-10-31 上传
2023-03-12 上传
2023-07-09 上传
2023-07-20 上传
2023-03-16 上传
shoushudao111
- 粉丝: 57
- 资源: 176
我的内容管理
展开
最新资源
- AirKiss技术详解：无线传递信息与智能家居连接
- Hibernate主键生成策略详解
- 操作系统实验：位示图法管理磁盘空闲空间
- JSON详解：数据交换的主流格式
- Win7安装Ubuntu双系统详细指南
- FPGA内部结构与工作原理探索
- 信用评分模型解析：WOE、IV与ROC
- 使用LVS+Keepalived构建高可用负载均衡集群
- 微信小程序驱动餐饮与服装业创新转型：便捷管理与低成本优势
- 机器学习入门指南：从基础到进阶
- 解决Win7 IIS配置错误500.22与0x80070032
- SQL-DFS：优化HDFS小文件存储的解决方案
- Hadoop、Hbase、Spark环境部署与主机配置详解
- Kisso：加密会话Cookie实现的单点登录SSO
- OpenCV读取与拼接多幅图像教程
- QT实战：轻松生成与解析JSON数据
