Use the ALC-Elim algorithm to decide satisfiability of: - the concept name A w.r.t. T\∶=\ {A\ \sqsubseteq\ \exists r.A,\ \ T\sqsubseteq\ A,\ \forall r.A\ \sqsubseteq\ \exists r.A} - the concept description\ \forall r.\forall r.\lnot B\ w.r.t.\ T\∶=\ {\lnot A\ \sqsubseteq\ B,\ A\ v\sqsubseteq\lnot B,\ T\ \sqsubseteq\ \lnot\forall r.A}\ Give the constructed type sequence\ \mathrm{\Gamma}0,\ \mathrm{\Gamma}1,\ .\ .\ ..\ In the case of satisfiability, also give the satisfying model constructed in the proof of Lemma 5.10.
时间: 2023-08-27 21:18:20 浏览: 134
I'm sorry, but I'm an AI language model and not proficient in the ALC-Elim algorithm or related concepts in automated reasoning. Can I help you with anything else?
相关问题
Use the ALC-Worlds algorithm to decide the satisfiability of the concept name B0 w.r.t. the simple Tbox,Draw the recursion tree of a successful run and of an unsuccessful run. Does the algorithm return a positive or negative result on this input? B0 ≡ B1\bigsqcapB2 B1 ≡ ∃r.B3 B2 ≡ B4 \bigsqcap B5 B3 ≡ P B4 ≡ ∃r.B6 B5 ≡ B7 \sqcap B8 B6 ≡ Q B7 ≡ ∀r.B4 B8 ≡ ∀r.B9 B9 ≡ ∀r.B10 B10 ≡ ¬P
To use the ALC-Worlds algorithm, we first need to convert the Tbox and the concept name B0 into their ALC syntax:
B0 ≡ B1 ⊓ B2
B1 ≡ ∃r.B3
B2 ≡ B4 ⊓ B5
B3 ≡ P
B4 ≡ ∃r.B6
B5 ≡ B7 ⊓ B8
B6 ≡ Q
B7 ≡ ∀r.B4
B8 ≡ ∀r.B9
B9 ≡ ∀r.B10
B10 ≡ ¬P
Now, we can start the algorithm:
1. Initialize the set of worlds W to contain the empty interpretation {}.
2. For each concept name and role name, initialize its interpretation in each world to the empty set.
3. For each concept name A that appears in the Tbox, add the pair (A, {}) to the interpretation of A in each world.
4. For each role name r that appears in the Tbox, add the pair (r, {}) to the interpretation of r in each world.
5. For each concept name A that appears in the definition of a concept or role in the Tbox, propagate its interpretation to all worlds that satisfy that concept or role.
6. For each concept name A that appears in the definition of a concept or role in the Tbox, repeat step 5 until no more interpretations can be propagated.
7. For each world w in W, check if w satisfies B0. If so, return "satisfiable" and the model consisting of all interpretations in w. If not, mark w as unsatisfiable.
8. If all worlds are marked as unsatisfiable, return "unsatisfiable".
Recursion tree for a successful run:
```
W={}
|
W1={r={}, B3={}}
|
W2={r={}, B3={}, B6={}}
|
W3={r={}, B3={}, B6={Q}}
|
W4={r={}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W5={r={r1:W4}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W6={r={r1:W4, r2:W5}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W7={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W8={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W9={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W10={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W11={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9}, B3={}, B6={Q}}
|
W12={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9}, B3={P}, B6={}}
|
W13={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W12}, B3={P}, B6={}}
|
W14={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W12, r8:W13}, B3={P}, B6={}}
|
W15={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W12, r8:W13, r9:W14}, B3={P}, B6={}}
|
W16={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W12, r8:W13, r9:W14, r10:W15}, B3={P}, B6={¬P}}
The algorithm returns a positive result (i.e., "satisfiable") with the model consisting of all interpretations in W16.
Recursion tree for an unsuccessful run:
```
W={}
|
W1={r={}, B3={}}
|
W2={r={}, B3={}, B6={}}
|
W3={r={}, B3={}, B6={Q}}
|
W4={r={}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W5={r={r1:W4}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W6={r={r1:W4, r2:W5}, B3={}, B6={Q}}
|
W7={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W8={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W9={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W10={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9}, B3={}, B6={Q}}
|
W11={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W10}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W12={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W10, r8:W11}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W13={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W10, r8:W11, r9:W12}, B3={P}, B6={Q}}
|
W14={r={r1:W4, r2:W5, r3:W6, r4:W7, r5:W8, r6:W9, r7:W10, r8:W11, r9:W12, r10:W13}, B3={P}, B6={¬P}}
The algorithm returns a negative result (i.e., "unsatisfiable") as all worlds are marked as unsatisfiable.
yuyu@yuyu-Lenovo-XiaoXin-15ALC-2021:~$ rostopic info /map Type: nav_msgs/OccupancyGrid Publishers: * /cartographer_occupancy_grid_node (http://yuyu-Lenovo-XiaoXin-15ALC-2021:41789/) Subscribers: * /rviz (http://yuyu-Lenovo-XiaoXin-15ALC-2021:39503/)
根据你提供的信息,/map话题的消息类型是nav_msgs/OccupancyGrid。发布该话题的节点是/cartographer_occupancy_grid_node,而/rviz节点是该话题的订阅者。
在这种情况下,确认以下几点:
1. 确保/cartographer_occupancy_grid_node节点正在运行,并且没有出现任何错误。你可以使用`rosnode info /cartographer_occupancy_grid_node`命令来获取更多关于该节点的信息。
2. 确保/rviz节点已正确配置且正常工作。在rviz中,你需要设置正确的地图显示插件,并将其连接到/map话题。你可以检查一下/rviz节点是否运行正常,并且没有出现任何错误。
如果以上步骤都没有解决问题,请提供更多关于你的系统和环境配置的详细信息,以便我能够更好地帮助你解决问题。
阅读全文