![](https://csdnimg.cn/release/download_crawler_static/19912545/bg1.jpg)
222
EDWARD EARL
GOTTS
tioning,
it
will be necessary to study children, who have different levels of
SA,
while they are actively engaged in a variety of behavior changing experiences. The
correlational and quasi-experimental findings of the
CDS
Projects have succeeded
in pointing out some of the areas at which future attention should be aimed.
For
this,
we
can be grateful.
REFERENCES
CATTELL,
R.
B.
Personality and motivation strueture
and
measurement.
New York: World,
1957.
CRONBACH, L.
J.
Educational psychology.
(2nd ed.) New York: Harcourt, Brace
&
World,
1962.
FREUD,
S.
The problem
of
anziety.
New York: Psychoanalytic Quarterly Press
&
Norton,
1936.
GOTTS,
E.
E.,
hms,
R. L.,
&
P~LLIPS,
B.
N. A classification system for discrete pupil behaviors.
Paper read at the American Educational Research Association meeting
in
New York, February
1967.
LEARY, T.,
&
COFFEY,
H. S.
Interpersonal diagnosis: Some problems
of
methodology and validation.
Journal
of
Alnwrmal
and
Social
Psychology,
1955,
60,
110-124.
hwm,
E.
E.
The psychology
of
anziety.
New York: Bobbs-Merrill,
1967.
LINDSLEY,
D.
B.
Psychophysiology and motivation. In
M.
R. Jones (Ed.),
Nebraska symposium
MALBIO,
R.
B.
Activation:
A
neurophysiological dimension.
Psycholo+l
Review,
1959,66, 367-386.
on
mtivatiun.
Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press,
1957.
Pp.
44-105.
MANDLER,
G.,
&
SARASON,
S.
B.
A study of anxiety and learning.
Journal
of
Abnormal
and
Social
Psgchologg,
1952,47, 166-173.
Pmm&,
B.
N.
An analysis
of
causes of anxiety among children in
school.
Final Report, USOE
P~LLIPS,
B.
N.
A report on a series
of
studies
of
anxiety and school behavior. Paper read at AECI
RUEBUSH,
B.
K. Anxiet In H. W. Stevenson,
J.
Kagan,
&
C. Spiker (Eds.),
Child psychology.
62nd
SARASON,
S.
B.,
DAVIDSON, K.
S.,
LIGHTHALL,
F.
F.,
WAITE,
R.
R.,
&
Ruebush, B. K.
Anxiety
in
SPENCE,
K.
W.
Behavior theory
and
conditioning.
New Haven: Yale,
1956.
TAYLOR,
JANET
A. Drive theory and manifest anxiety.
Psychological Bulletin,
1956,
63,
303-320.
Project No.
2616.
Austin: University of Texas,
1966.
Study Conference, Washington,
D.
C.,
March,
1967.
N.
S. S.
E. Yearboot. Chicago: University
of
Chicago Press,
1963.
Pp.
460-516.
elementary
school
children.
New York: Wiley,
1960.
TOLERANCE
OF
COGNITIVE INTERFERENCE IN UNDERACHIEVING
AND HIGH ACHIEVING SECONDARY SCHOOL BOYS
ANTHONY
DAVIDS,
JACK
SIDMAN~,
AND
MORTON
SILVERMAN
Brown
University
and
Bradley
Hospilal
For the past few years, Brown University has conducted two independent
summer programs for secondary school students-one for academically successful
students who show outstanding potential for careers in science
(NSF
program),
and the other for intellectually bright students who are failing in their regular school
setting (academic potential project).
In
working with these underachievers,
it
was
found that the boys frequently mentioned their difficulties in concentration. They
voiced grave concern with the fact that often when they attempted to study
or
to
'This research was made possible by
a
grant
to
Brown University from the Carnegie Cor oration
in
support of the academic potential project and
a
grant from tbe National Science FounLtion in
support
of
the summer science ro ram.
*Now
at the University
o!C8orado.